It's always important to evaluate a source. Evaluating a source means checking that source to make sure that it is credible and reliable. This means that the sources you use should not make any false claims, should be written by someone who knows what they’re talking about, and should contain information that relates directly to your topic.
Here are some LibGuides we created to help you with evaluating different types of sources. These can also be found in our Library Research Skills folder of our LibGuides' subject landing page.
Is the author well qualified?
How reliable is the periodical?
Is this source current enough for your topic?
Is this source relevant to your topic, the arguments, or the information needed for your research assignment?
Is the author well qualified?
What is the reputation of the book's publishing company?
How was the book reviewed by critics?
Is this source current enough for your topic?
Is this source relevant to your topic, the arguments, or the information needed for your research assignment?
At the BC Library, our very own librarian, Faith Bradham, developed a tool that can help you evaluate any type of source. It is a rubric, much like professors often use grading rubrics for assignments, to grade (evaluate) the source you are considering using for research. There are five categories to evaluate and score anywhere from 0-3 points, and then add up the scores to compare to a point scale to determine whether you have found a credible source for academic research. The categories to evaluate are date, author, publisher, purpose, and relevance. To help you remember the five categories, we call this the DAPPR Test Rubric. You can find the rubric, including a downloadable version, in the box below.
Watch the following 2 videos to see how scoring a source on the DAPPR test might go from start to finish.